by Hannoske » Mon Jul 01, 2013 9:33 am
Not to detract from the quality of the items entered, but the scores do seem higher than I am used to seeing. Since your table is lined up by score, and not judge, it is hard for me to tell if you have one judge that frequently disagreed, or if on some items it was more varied.
Example:
Scoot/Sybilla had a Blue shield that scored 4,4,4,4,3.6. That is almost perfectly in line.
Sybilla had a SG Animal Barding and a Court Doublet that scored 5,5,5,5,3.2. If the judges that scored 3.2 and 3.6 were the same person, these scores make sense. If not, then I would have to ask what they saw the others missed.
I guess what I am getting at, is there isn't really enough data to see the big picture. Don't know the judges, don't know if they were consistent, and I didn't see any of the entries. Because I over analyze everything, I would of course love to know more, but meh.
In the end, good job on qualifying and the good scores.
As an aside, I feel like I am missing info, does Thorn=Rose?